What diapers are safe? Here’s Our Verdict

Attitude Little Ones Eco Diapers

Avoid$$

Last reviewed

Quick verdict

A 2023 independent test found 60 ppm organic fluorine (a PFAS marker) on the inner, skin-contact layer — the highest result among eco-marketed diapers in that round of testing.

Check the package version: the research does not yet confirm an exact match to every current product. See version details.

The reported fluorine test predates the September-2024 EWG record/current formulation evidence. Manufacturer warns that formulations/products can evolve and package information should be checked. See the full research below.

Good / Caution / Avoid

Avoid
  • A 2023 independent test found 60 ppm organic fluorine (a PFAS marker) on the inner, skin-contact layer — the highest result among eco-marketed diapers in that round of testing.
  • A confirmed detection, not disputed — disqualifying under our standard regardless of the brand’s other environmental claims.
Good
  • Manufacturer currently publishes unusually detailed percentage-based material construction.
  • Current EWG product record located.
Read the original editorial assessment

Verdict: Avoid. Current package matching remains unresolved; read the newer evidence below.

Returned an organic-fluorine (a PFAS marker) detection of 60 parts per million on the inner (skin-contact) layer in 2023 independent lab testing — the highest result among diapers marketed on eco/green credentials in that round of testing, and disqualifying under our standard regardless of the brand's other environmental claims.

Price tiers are relative within this category and may change over time.

Compare products in this category

Findings on this site reflect the specific products, lots, and formulations examined on the dates cited. Manufacturers change formulations and suppliers without notice; a result reported for one lot does not guarantee the same result for another. Check the "last reviewed" date and the cited source before relying on any finding.

Materials & ingredients

Factors flagged in the editorial review. Expand the research below for full formulation records, functions and sources.

Material or ingredientWhat it isConcern levelWhy it's flagged here
PFASPFAS ("per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances") is a family of thousands of manufactured chemicals that share a carbon-fluorine backbone, one of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry.Avoid entirelyA confirmed detection, not a disputed one — disqualifying under our standard regardless of the brand's other environmental claims.

What's disclosed in our research

Materials disclosed by the manufacturer or a retailer, as captured in our research — not the same as the flagged-concerns table above, and not asserted here as a complete or currently-verified ingredient list unless noted. See the full research below for sources and limitations.

ComponentMaterialTouches skin?Function
TopsheetBamboo fiber (100%)YesSkin-contact topsheet
Absorbent coreSodium polyacrylate (57.4%)NoSuperabsorbent core material
Absorbent coreWood pulp (33%)NoAbsorbent core material
Absorbent corePolypropylene (9.6%)NoCore structural material
Leg cuffsPolypropylene (50%)YesLeak-control cuff
Leg cuffsPolytetrahydrofuran (50%)YesElastic/stretch component
Closing systemPolypropylene (40%)NoFastening structure
Closing systemAdhesive (40%)NoBonding
Closing systemPolytetrahydrofuran (20%)NoElastic/stretch component
AdhesivePetroleum resin (100%)NoAssembly/bonding
BacksheetBamboo fabric (70.7%)NoOuter layer
BacksheetPolyethylene (29%)NoMoisture barrier
BacksheetPrinted ink (0.3%)NoExternal printing
Printed inkPigment Blue 15 (48% of ink)NoBlue pigment
Printed inkPolyacrylic acid (48% of ink)NoBinder/dispersant
Printed inkWater (2% of ink)NoCarrier
Printed inkPolyethylene (1.8% of ink)NoInk/polymer component
Printed inkAminomethyl propanol (0.2% of ink)NopH adjuster / neutralizer

Testing history

SourceDateTested forResult
Independent lab testing2023Organic fluorine (a PFAS marker) (inner/skin-contact layer)60 ppm detected — the highest result among eco/green-marketed diapers in that round of testing

Explore the research

Research record last verified: 2026-09-16.

This evidence file is still being deepened with citations and package-version detail — the published verdict above already reflects everything gathered so far, and doesn't change as that detail is filled in.

What you should know

  • A Size 1-2 sample was reported at 60 ppm organic fluorine on the inside; exact match to the current formulation is unresolved.

What's still uncertain

  • Need exact current package/SKU and formulation match to the tested sample.
  • Exact current OEKO-TEX certificate number remains pending.

Exact product identity

Technical detail — Exact product identity
Canonical Product Name
Attitude Little Ones Eco Diapers
Category
Diapers
Region
United States / North America
Brand
ATTITUDE
Market Status
current
Exact Variant
Baby Leaves / eco-conscious disposable diapers
Package Generation
Current manufacturer formulation appears newer than the tested Size 1-2 sample
Aliases
  • ATTITUDE Baby Leaves Diapers
  • ATTITUDE Eco Diapers Couches Baby Diapers

Formulations, ingredients & materials

Technical detail — Formulations, ingredients & materials
  • Formulation Id
    ATTITUDE-CURRENT-MFR
    Status
    probably_current
    Region
    North America
    Variant
    Baby Leaves / eco-conscious disposable diapers
    Materials
    • Component
      Topsheet
      Material
      Bamboo fiber
      Percentage
      100%
      Function
      Skin-contact topsheet
      Skin Contact
      Yes
    • Component
      Absorbent core
      Material
      Sodium polyacrylate
      Percentage
      57.4%
      Function
      Superabsorbent core material
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Absorbent core
      Material
      Wood pulp
      Percentage
      33%
      Function
      Absorbent core material
      Skin Contact
      No
      Notes
      Manufacturer describes pulp as FSC-certified and Totally Chlorine-Free.
    • Component
      Absorbent core
      Material
      Polypropylene
      Percentage
      9.6%
      Function
      Core structural material
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Leg cuffs
      Material
      Polypropylene
      Percentage
      50%
      Function
      Leak-control cuff
      Skin Contact
      Yes
    • Component
      Leg cuffs
      Material
      Polytetrahydrofuran
      Percentage
      50%
      Function
      Elastic/stretch component
      Skin Contact
      Yes
    • Component
      Closing system
      Material
      Polypropylene
      Percentage
      40%
      Function
      Fastening structure
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Closing system
      Material
      Adhesive
      Percentage
      40%
      Function
      Bonding
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Closing system
      Material
      Polytetrahydrofuran
      Percentage
      20%
      Function
      Elastic/stretch component
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Adhesive
      Material
      Petroleum resin
      Percentage
      100%
      Function
      Assembly/bonding
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Backsheet
      Material
      Bamboo fabric
      Percentage
      70.7%
      Function
      Outer layer
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Backsheet
      Material
      Polyethylene
      Percentage
      29%
      Function
      Moisture barrier
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Backsheet
      Material
      Printed ink
      Percentage
      0.3%
      Function
      External printing
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Printed ink
      Material
      Pigment Blue 15
      Percentage
      48% of ink
      Function
      Blue pigment
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Printed ink
      Material
      Polyacrylic acid
      Percentage
      48% of ink
      Function
      Binder/dispersant
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Printed ink
      Material
      Water
      Percentage
      2% of ink
      Function
      Carrier
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Printed ink
      Material
      Polyethylene
      Percentage
      1.8% of ink
      Function
      Ink/polymer component
      Skin Contact
      No
    • Component
      Printed ink
      Material
      Aminomethyl propanol
      Percentage
      0.2% of ink
      Function
      pH adjuster / neutralizer
      Skin Contact
      No

Presence and absence claims

Technical detail — Presence and absence claims
  • Substance Or Property
    Added fragrance
    Status
    manufacturer_says_not_intentionally_added
    Scope
    Current product claim
  • Substance Or Property
    Totally Chlorine-Free pulp
    Status
    manufacturer_claim
    Scope
    Wood pulp

Testing: methods, samples & results

The tested Size 1-2 sample had 60 ppm organic fluorine on the inside and an outside non-detect above the 10 ppm reporting capability. This screen does not identify a specific PFAS compound.

Technical detail
  • Test Category
    organic_fluorine_screen
    Interpretation
    The tested Size 1-2 sample had 60 ppm organic fluorine on the inside and an outside non-detect above the 10 ppm reporting capability. This screen does not identify a specific PFAS compound.
    Exact Product
    ATTITUDE Eco Diapers Couches Baby Diapers Size 1-2
    Test Id
    ATTITUDE-MAMAVATION-SIZE1-2
    Organization
    Mamavation
    Laboratory
    EPA-certified laboratory; exact lab not captured in current record
    Test Date
    2024-04-29 update
    Method
    Organic-fluorine screening as described in Mamavation diaper investigation
    Analytes
    • Analyte
      Organic fluorine - inside
      Result
      60
      Unit
      ppm
      Reporting Limit
      10 ppm
      Detection Status
      detected
    • Analyte
      Organic fluorine - outside
      Result
      Non-detect
      Unit
      ppm
      Reporting Limit
      10 ppm
      Detection Status
      not_detected_above_reporting_capability
    Limitations
    • Exact match to the later September-2024 EWG-reviewed/current formulation has not been established.
    • Organic fluorine screening does not identify which fluorinated compound(s) caused the signal.

Certifications: scope & limitations

Certifications reviewed: EWG Verified, OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100, FSC. Does not establish that every production lot is analytically free of unintended contaminants. Exact active certificate number has not yet been independently verified in this record.

Technical detail
  • Certification
    EWG Verified
    Status
    current_record_located
    Certifying Body
    Environmental Working Group
    Product Scope
    ATTITUDE Baby Leaves Diapers Midi Size 3 and multiple current ATTITUDE diaper products
    Date Verified
    2026-09-16
    Does Not Establish
    • Does not establish that every production lot is analytically free of unintended contaminants.
  • Certification
    OEKO-TEX STANDARD 100
    Status
    manufacturer_claim_exact_certificate_pending
    Certifying Body
    OEKO-TEX
    Date Verified
    2026-09-16
    Does Not Establish
    • Exact active certificate number has not yet been independently verified in this record.
  • Certification
    FSC
    Status
    manufacturer_claim
    Certifying Body
    Forest Stewardship Council
    Product Scope
    Wood pulp
    Date Verified
    2026-09-16

Evidence assessment & uncertainty

Technical detail — Evidence assessment & uncertainty
Positive Attributes
  • Manufacturer currently publishes unusually detailed percentage-based material construction.
  • Current EWG product record located.
Important Concerns
  • A Size 1-2 sample was reported at 60 ppm organic fluorine on the inside; exact match to the current formulation is unresolved.
Uncertainties
  • Need exact current package/SKU and formulation match to the tested sample.
  • Exact current OEKO-TEX certificate number remains pending.
Unverified Claims
No entries recorded

Formulation verification

The current package still needs to be matched to this evidence because: The reported fluorine test predates the September-2024 EWG record/current formulation evidence. Manufacturer warns that formulations/products can evolve and package information should be checked.

Technical detail
Formulation Verification Required
Yes
Reasons
  • The reported fluorine test predates the September-2024 EWG record/current formulation evidence.
  • Manufacturer warns that formulations/products can evolve and package information should be checked.
Package Evidence Needed
  • Current U.S. package materials panel
  • UPC/GTIN
  • OEKO-TEX certificate/label number
  • lot/manufacturing code
Sources & provenance (3)
  1. Source Id
    ATT-S1
    Title
    Baby Leaves / eco-conscious disposable diapers product page
    Source Type
    manufacturer
    Organization
    ATTITUDE
    Publication Date
    Not recorded
    Update Date
    Not recorded
    Access Date
    2026-09-16
    Primary Source
    Yes
    Exact Product Match
    probable
    What It Establishes
    Current percentage-based diaper construction, TCF/FSC pulp and current manufacturer claims.
    Limitations
    Regional page; current package should still be checked.
  2. Source Id
    ATT-S2
    Title
    ATTITUDE Baby Leaves Diapers Midi Size 3
    Source Type
    certification_database
    Organization
    Environmental Working Group
    Publication Date
    Not recorded
    Update Date
    2024-09
    Access Date
    2026-09-16
    Primary Source
    Yes
    Exact Product Match
    exact
    What It Establishes
    EWG Verified Size 3 record and material list consistent with current manufacturer disclosure.
    Limitations
    Size-specific 2024 record.
  3. Source Id
    ATT-S3
    Title
    Disposable diaper and baby wipes investigation
    Source Type
    independent_testing_report
    Organization
    Mamavation
    Publication Date
    Not recorded
    Update Date
    2024-04-29
    Access Date
    2026-09-16
    Primary Source
    No
    Exact Product Match
    probable
    What It Establishes
    Reported 60 ppm organic fluorine inside and outside non-detect for ATTITUDE Size 1-2 sample.
    Limitations
    Tested generation may not match current 2024/2026 formulation.

Ingredient & material research library · How we assess evidence

Read the category’s editorial sources

Final verdict against our diapers standard

This is the published editorial verdict. Read the formulation caveats and working research above; the imported evidence has not automatically re-scored this product.

Avoid Published as Avoid under the published standard for diapers, based on the specific, dated findings above. That standard was written before this or any other product on the page was evaluated, and doesn't change to fit a favorite — see the full site-wide standard for how every category is held to the same process.