Coterie The Diaper
Quick verdict
Detailed composition and reported testing provide useful starting points for this review.
Check the package version: the research does not yet confirm an exact match to every current product. See version details.
Full current size/SKU-specific formulation extraction is not yet complete. See the full research below.
We may earn a commission through affiliate links, at no extra cost to you. Our verdicts remain independent. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Read the full disclosure.
Check PriceAmazon · Paid linkGood / Caution / Avoid
- Good
- Current manufacturer publishes unusually detailed composition information.
- EWG record located for current-size product.
- Both organic-fluorine screening and a separate targeted PFAS test have been reported.
- Caution
- The research record does not yet capture every disclosed component.
- Full numerical results and test limits remain incomplete.
Read the original editorial assessment
Became EWG Verified on June 2, 2026; also OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certified and independently lab-tested in Germany. TCF wood-pulp core, roughly 25% plant-based materials, no fragrance, lotion, latex, parabens, or phthalates disclosed; the manufacturer's own materials list does disclose pigments/inks used for printed markings (not a skin-contact layer), so we no longer describe it as dye-free. Tested non-detect for organic fluorine (a PFAS marker) in initial independent testing, and non-detect across 40 specific, targeted PFAS compounds screened down to parts-per-trillion in a 2024 follow-up. Highest absorbency and overnight leak protection of the products on this page in the testing we reviewed. Acquired by Mammoth Brands in October 2025 — worth rechecking this entry if the formulation changes.
Compare products in this category
Materials & ingredients
No ingredient on this product's own label was specifically flagged in our review. See ingredient concerns for diapers as a whole for what we check for in this category.
What's disclosed in our research
| Component | Material | Touches skin? | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topsheet | 99% polypropylene; 1% sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate | Yes | Skin-contact topsheet / wetting |
| Transfer layer | 100% PET (polyester) | No | Fluid transfer/acquisition |
| Absorbent core | 45% TCF cellulose; 55% SAP/water/silicon dioxide mixture | No | Absorbency |
| Adhesives | Three disclosed adhesive-polymer systems; exact full extraction pending | No | Assembly/bonding |
| Wetness indicator | Disclosed multi-ingredient indicator mixture; exact full extraction pending | No | Color-change wetness indication |
| Pigments/inks | Identified pigments disclosed by manufacturer; exact full extraction pending | No | Printing / visual markings |
Testing history
| Source | Date | Tested for | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent lab testing (Germany) | — | Organic fluorine (a PFAS marker) and general safety screening | Non-detect for organic fluorine in initial testing |
| Independent lab testing (follow-up) | 2024 | 40 specific PFAS compounds, screened down to parts-per-trillion | Non-detect |
Certifications held
| Certification | What it actually verifies |
|---|---|
| EWG Verified | Screens the finished product against EWG's list of chemicals of concern. |
| OEKO-TEX Standard 100 | Tests textiles against a defined list of harmful substances; does not guarantee PFAS-free, since its test method can miss certain fluoropolymers. |
Recalls, litigation & complaint history
| Case / event | Status |
|---|---|
| Saedi et al. v. Coterie Baby, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-03893 (S.D.N.Y.) | A PFAS class action concerning Coterie's diapers, dismissed in October 2024 for failing to plausibly allege the specific product purchased actually contained PFAS — a standing/pleading ruling, not a finding on the merits. |
Explore the research
This evidence file is still being deepened with citations and package-version detail — the published verdict above already reflects everything gathered so far, and doesn't change as that detail is filled in.
What you should know
- The current partial record does not yet transcribe every percentage/component from the manufacturer full-materials page.
- Manufacturer-described contaminant testing still needs underlying numerical laboratory results where obtainable.
What's still uncertain
- Exact lot/batch and full analyte-by-analyte limits for the reported PFAS testing remain to be captured.
Exact product identity
Technical detail — Exact product identity
- Canonical Product Name
- Coterie The Diaper
- Category
- Diapers
- Region
- United States
- Brand
- Coterie
- Market Status
- current
- Exact Variant
- The Diaper; size-specific SKUs
- Package Generation
- Current 2026 formulation/material disclosure
- Aliases
- Sizes
Formulations, ingredients & materials
Technical detail — Formulations, ingredients & materials
- Formulation Id
- COTERIE-2026-MFR
- Status
- probably_current
- Region
- United States
- Variant
- The Diaper
- Size Scope
- Manufacturer disclosure includes size-specific examples; Size 4 percentages captured here where explicitly reported
- Observed From
- 2026-06-02
- Package Generation
- Current manufacturer full-materials disclosure
- Materials
- Component
- Topsheet
- Material
- 99% polypropylene; 1% sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate
- Function
- Skin-contact topsheet / wetting
- Skin Contact
- Yes
- Source Ids
- Component
- Transfer layer
- Material
- 100% PET (polyester)
- Function
- Fluid transfer/acquisition
- Skin Contact
- No
- Source Ids
- Component
- Absorbent core
- Material
- 45% TCF cellulose; 55% SAP/water/silicon dioxide mixture
- Function
- Absorbency
- Skin Contact
- No
- Source Ids
- Component
- Adhesives
- Material
- Three disclosed adhesive-polymer systems; exact full extraction pending
- Function
- Assembly/bonding
- Skin Contact
- No
- Source Ids
- Component
- Wetness indicator
- Material
- Disclosed multi-ingredient indicator mixture; exact full extraction pending
- Function
- Color-change wetness indication
- Skin Contact
- No
- Source Ids
- Component
- Pigments/inks
- Material
- Identified pigments disclosed by manufacturer; exact full extraction pending
- Function
- Printing / visual markings
- Skin Contact
- No
- Source Ids
- Source Ids
Testing: methods, samples & results
Published screening reported non-detect organic fluorine for Coterie diaper portions; this is not equivalent to proving absence of every individual PFAS compound. (2 tests recorded — see the technical detail below for every result.)
Technical detail
- Test Category
- organic_fluorine_screen
- Interpretation
- Published screening reported non-detect organic fluorine for Coterie diaper portions; this is not equivalent to proving absence of every individual PFAS compound.
- Exact Product
- Coterie diaper
- Test Id
- COTERIE-MAMAVATION-ORGANIC-FLUORINE
- Organization
- Mamavation
- Laboratory
- EPA-certified laboratory; exact lab not captured in current partial record
- Method
- Organic-fluorine screening as described in Mamavation diaper investigation
- Analytes
- Analyte
- Organic fluorine - inside
- Result
- Non-detect
- Unit
- ppm
- Reporting Limit
- Study screening threshold; verify exact sample-level reporting line
- Detection Status
- not_detected_above_reporting_capability
- Analyte
- Organic fluorine - outside
- Result
- Non-detect
- Unit
- ppm
- Reporting Limit
- Study screening threshold; verify exact sample-level reporting line
- Detection Status
- not_detected_above_reporting_capability
- Limitations
- Exact SKU/lot details should be captured from the underlying report if available.
- Source Ids
- Test Category
- specific_PFAS
- Interpretation
- Targeted PFAS testing is analytically distinct from total/organic-fluorine screening and is preserved separately.
- Exact Product
- Coterie Size 1 diaper
- Test Id
- COTERIE-2024-TARGETED-PFAS
- Organization
- Mamavation
- Laboratory
- Not captured in current partial record
- Test Date
- 2024
- Method
- Targeted analysis for 40 PFAS analytes; public summary states ppt-level sensitivity
- Analytes
- Analyte
- 40 targeted PFAS analytes
- Result
- All reported non-detect
- Unit
- ppt
- Reporting Limit
- Analyte-specific limits not yet transcribed
- Detection Status
- not_detected_above_reporting_capability
- Limitations
- Full laboratory report, method identifiers, individual analytes and individual reporting limits still need transcription.
- Source Ids
Certifications: scope & limitations
Certifications reviewed: EWG Verified, OEKO-TEX testing/certification context. Does not by itself establish absence of every unintended contaminant in every production lot. Underlying numerical results have not yet been fully transcribed into this record.
Technical detail
- Certification
- EWG Verified
- Status
- current_record_located
- Certifying Body
- Environmental Working Group
- Date Verified
- 2026-09-16
- Product Scope
- Coterie The Diaper; Size 3 record reviewed
- Does Not Establish
- Does not by itself establish absence of every unintended contaminant in every production lot.
- Source Ids
- Certification
- OEKO-TEX testing/certification context
- Status
- manufacturer_reported_safety_report
- Certifying Body
- OEKO-TEX
- Date Verified
- 2026-09-16
- Product Scope
- Current Coterie diaper safety-report program
- Does Not Establish
- Underlying numerical results have not yet been fully transcribed into this record.
- Source Ids
Manufacturer claims
Technical detail — Manufacturer claims
- Claim
- Coterie reports independent OEKO-TEX laboratory testing across 13 heavy metals, 120+ pesticides, 20+ phthalates, bisphenols, VOCs, PFAS and other substances, with certification granted in March 2025.
- Verification Status
- manufacturer_reported; full numerical lab report transcription pending
- Source Ids
Legal history: allegations & outcomes
Technical detail — Legal history: allegations & outcomes
- Case Name
- Saedi v. Coterie Baby, Inc.
- Docket
- 1:24-cv-03893
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Filed Date
- 2024
- Event Type
- dismissal
- Current Status
- First amended complaint dismissed without prejudice on 2024-10-03 for lack of Article III standing.
- Exact Product Scope
- Coterie diapers
- Allegations
- Plaintiff alleged Coterie diapers contained PFAS despite PFAS-free / harmful-chemical-free marketing.
- Findings
- Court did not find that Coterie diapers contained PFAS.
- Court did not find that Coterie diapers were PFAS-free.
- Dismissal was based on standing and failure to plausibly connect the tested/general contamination allegations to diapers purchased by the plaintiff.
Evidence assessment & uncertainty
Technical detail — Evidence assessment & uncertainty
- Positive Attributes
- Current manufacturer publishes unusually detailed composition information.
- EWG record located for current-size product.
- Both organic-fluorine screening and a separate targeted PFAS test have been reported.
- Important Concerns
- The current partial record does not yet transcribe every percentage/component from the manufacturer full-materials page.
- Manufacturer-described contaminant testing still needs underlying numerical laboratory results where obtainable.
- Uncertainties
- Exact lot/batch and full analyte-by-analyte limits for the reported PFAS testing remain to be captured.
- Unverified Claims
Formulation verification
The current package still needs to be matched to this evidence because: Full current size/SKU-specific formulation extraction is not yet complete.
Technical detail
- Formulation Verification Required
- Yes
- Reasons
- Full current size/SKU-specific formulation extraction is not yet complete.
- Package Evidence Needed
- Current package materials panel, UPC/GTIN, lot code and certification markings.
Sources & provenance (5)
- Source Id
- COT-S1
- Title
- Full Materials List
- Source Type
- manufacturer
- Organization
- Coterie
- Publication Date
- 2026-06-02
- Update Date
- Access Date
- 2026-09-16
- Primary Source
- Yes
- Exact Product Match
- exact
- What It Establishes
- Current June 2026 composition disclosure including material percentages and component functions.
- Limitations
- Not recorded
- Source Id
- COT-S2
- Title
- Coterie The Diaper, Size 3
- Source Type
- certification_database
- Organization
- Environmental Working Group
- Publication Date
- Update Date
- 2026-06
- Access Date
- 2026-09-16
- Primary Source
- Yes
- Exact Product Match
- exact
- What It Establishes
- Current EWG product record; data updated June 2026.
- Limitations
- Not recorded
- Source Id
- COT-S3
- Title
- Safety Reports
- Source Type
- manufacturer
- Organization
- Coterie
- Publication Date
- Update Date
- Access Date
- 2026-09-16
- Primary Source
- Yes
- Exact Product Match
- exact
- What It Establishes
- Manufacturer summary of third-party/OEKO-TEX laboratory testing categories and certification timing.
- Limitations
- Not recorded
- Source Id
- COT-S4
- Title
- Disposable Diapers & PFAS / fluorine testing investigation
- Source Type
- independent_testing_report
- Organization
- Mamavation
- Publication Date
- Update Date
- Access Date
- 2026-09-16
- Primary Source
- No
- Exact Product Match
- probable
- What It Establishes
- Reports Coterie organic-fluorine screening and a separate 2024 targeted 40-PFAS Size 1 test.
- Limitations
- Public article summary; full laboratory documentation should be captured where available.
- Source Id
- COT-LEGAL-1
- Title
- Saedi v. Coterie Baby, Inc., Order/Opinion
- Source Type
- court_record
- Organization
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York / Justia mirror
- Publication Date
- 2024-10-03
- Update Date
- Access Date
- 2026-09-16
- Primary Source
- Yes
- Exact Product Match
- exact
- What It Establishes
- Dismissal without prejudice for lack of Article III standing and the court's procedural reasoning.
- Limitations
- Dismissal on standing did not resolve the merits of PFAS allegations.
Ingredient & material research library · How we assess evidence
Read the category’s editorial sources
Final verdict against our diapers standard
Clean Published as Clean under the published standard for diapers, based on the specific, dated findings above. That standard was written before this or any other product on the page was evaluated, and doesn't change to fit a favorite — see the full site-wide standard for how every category is held to the same process.