Quick verdict

Verdict
Clean
Evidence
Moderate

A reformulated wipe with ingredient disclosures and published testing to examine.

Match the reviewed formula to your package; a test does not cover every batch. See version details.

Good
  • The reviewed formula uses sodium benzoate and has no phenoxyethanol.
  • The cited 30-compound PFAS panel reported non-detect.
Caution
  • Match the post-2024 formula; the diaper lawsuit is not evidence of PFAS in this wipe.

What we could not verify

  • Match the reviewed formula to your package; a test does not cover every batch.
  • Match the post-2024 formula; the diaper lawsuit is not evidence of PFAS in this wipe.
  • Certification scopes differ. None is a guarantee that a product will suit every child.
Why we reached this verdict

A clean 6-ingredient list since a 2024 reformulation, with no phenoxyethanol and sodium benzoate as the preservative. Confirmed current EWG Verified status, and confirmed OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certification granted in March 2025 (certificate #25.HUS.21538, Hohenstein) per Coterie's own published safety report. Non-detect for PFAS in Consumer Reports' June 2026 independent testing. A PFAS class action against Coterie (Saedi v. Coterie Baby, No. 1:24-cv-03893, S.D.N.Y.) concerned Coterie's diapers, not wipes, and was dismissed in October 2024 for failing to plausibly allege the specific product purchased actually contained PFAS a standing/pleading ruling, not a finding on the merits.

Last reviewed .

View evidenceCompare with this productEmail this pageRequest a product

We may earn a commission through affiliate links, at no extra cost to you. Our verdicts remain independent. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Read the full disclosure.

Check PriceAmazon · Paid link

Last reviewed

What we like and what concerns us

Good
  • The reviewed formula uses sodium benzoate and has no phenoxyethanol.
  • The cited 30-compound PFAS panel reported non-detect.
Caution
  • Match the post-2024 formula; the diaper lawsuit is not evidence of PFAS in this wipe.

What the evidence shows

  • PFAS in Baby Wipes: Results From CR's Tests Consumer Reports, 2026-06-11

    CR listed 'Coterie The Wipe' as Not Detected for 30 individual PFAS compounds, meaning none were found at or above its detection limit of 2.3 nanograms per sample.

    Independent lab test. About this exact product.

  • The Wipe | National Eczema Association National Eczema Association (Seal of Acceptance), 2026-01

    NEA lists 'Coterie The Wipe' in its Seal of Acceptance directory, with disclosed ingredients: Citric Acid, Glycerin, Hydroxyacetophenone, Purified Water, Sodium Benzoate, Tocopherol (Vitamin E).

    Certification record. About this exact product.

  • EWG Skin Deep | Coterie The Wipe EWG (EWG Verified), 2024-11

    The EWG Skin Deep page for 'Coterie The Wipe' shows the EWG Verified mark, which EWG says means the product avoids ingredients on its Unacceptable List and fully discloses ingredients including fragrance. The page data was last updated 2024-11.

    Certification record. About this exact product.

These are independent sources we located and read. Manufacturer statements are not counted as evidence. How we weigh sources

Why we reached this verdict

Verdict: Clean.

A clean 6-ingredient list since a 2024 reformulation, with no phenoxyethanol and sodium benzoate as the preservative. Confirmed current EWG Verified status, and confirmed OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certification granted in March 2025 (certificate #25.HUS.21538, Hohenstein) per Coterie's own published safety report. Non-detect for PFAS in Consumer Reports' June 2026 independent testing. A PFAS class action against Coterie (Saedi v. Coterie Baby, No. 1:24-cv-03893, S.D.N.Y.) concerned Coterie's diapers, not wipes, and was dismissed in October 2024 for failing to plausibly allege the specific product purchased actually contained PFAS a standing/pleading ruling, not a finding on the merits.

Price tiers are relative within this category and may change over time.

What we could not verify

  • Match the reviewed formula to your package; a test does not cover every batch.
  • Match the post-2024 formula; the diaper lawsuit is not evidence of PFAS in this wipe.
  • Certification scopes differ. None is a guarantee that a product will suit every child.

Missing information stays missing. See the full research record.

Materials & ingredients

Factors flagged in the editorial review.

No ingredient on this product's own label was specifically flagged in our review. See ingredient concerns for baby wipes as a whole for what we check for in this category.

Testing history

SourceDateTested forResult
Consumer Reports independent testingJune 2026PFAS (30 compounds)Non-detect

Certifications held

CertificationWhat it actually verifies
EWG VerifiedScreens the finished product against EWG's list of chemicals of concern.
OEKO-TEX Standard 100Certificate #25.HUS.21538 (Hohenstein), granted March 2025 per Coterie's own published safety report. Tests textiles against a defined list of harmful substances.

Explore the research

What the evidence tells us

The review links Consumer Reports’ June 2026 testing. Its panel examined 30 named PFAS compounds; a non-detect result applies to that panel and its tested samples, not to every PFAS or every future batch.

What's still uncertain

  • Match the reviewed formula to your package; a test does not cover every batch.
  • Match the post-2024 formula; the diaper lawsuit is not evidence of PFAS in this wipe.
  • Certification scopes differ. None is a guarantee that a product will suit every child.
Technical detail & sources

These notes summarize published evidence. We did not commission these tests.

Reported testing

Sources to read

Read the category’s editorial sources

Final verdict against our baby wipes standard

Clean Published as Clean under the published standard for baby wipes, based on the specific, dated findings above. That standard was written before this or any other product on the page was evaluated, and doesn't change to fit a favorite See the full site-wide standard for how every category is held to the same process.

Check PriceAmazon · Paid link

We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.